Tuesday, June 10, 2008

When politics surpass science

When you read the above post title, you probably thought "wow, another global warming post from Gordon".

Not this time. This one is about the public pandemic regarding AIDS/HIV.

A quarter of a century after the outbreak of Aids, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has accepted that the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared.

In the first official admission that the universal prevention strategy promoted by the major Aids organisations may have been misdirected, Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids said there will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.

Dr De Cock, an epidemiologist who has spent much of his career leading the battle against the disease, said understanding of the threat posed by the virus had changed. Whereas once it was seen as a risk to populations everywhere, it was now recognised that, outside sub-Saharan Africa, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.


Now that's a shocker! A politically based over reaction to an issue. You may be asking, "what would be the motivation for scaring the public?"

The fact is, how much money and research would be done on AIDS/HIV if the disease was confined to gays and intravenous drug use? Very little. It wasn't until "science" could link it to billions of infections that public policy would follow suit.

Sound familiar? Then yes, this is another global warming post.

Remember Alar? From Wiki

Elizabeth Whelan and her organization, the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) worked to establish a narrative of the Alar episode as a scare. The ACSH claimed that Alar and its breakdown product UDMH had not been shown to be carcinogenic. Whelan's campaign was so effective that today, Alar scare is shorthand among news media and food industry professionals for an irrational, emotional public scare based on propaganda rather than facts.

How about Red Dye Number 5? From Wiki

Upon its introduction into the market, there were fears that Allura Red AC was carcinogenic; however, studies have since shown that this is not the case.[citation needed] The initial reports of its consumption causing tumors have since been shown to have been caused by the presence of para-cresidine.[citation needed] Although para-cresidine is an important reactant in the manufacture of Allura Red AC and is a known carcinogen, further studies conducted since have found no trace of para-cresidine to be present in food-grade Allura Red AC.[citation needed]

Ten years from now, we'll be saying the same thing about global warming.

No comments: