"conservatives" are for status quo while "progressives" are for progress. I can live with that definition.
This is the comment (from a liberal I'm guessing) that perfectly illustrates my earlier post on "progressives".
How is it that spending more money and energy on the same old tired programs that have already proven themselves to be ineffective is considered "progressive" on any level?
How can you call what's happening in Cuyahoga County "progress"?
Look at any inner city, dominated by "progressive" thought. Do they look like the models of "progress"?
One could say conservatives are for status quo? I would counter conservatives are for effective? And just like I pointed out in my post Blue City Red Lights, people are not flocking to those areas dominated by "progressive" leadership; they're leaving. Wouldn't you think people would love living in a "progressive" place?
Maybe they just prefer effective.