The year 2010 is already a nightmare for progressives, and it's only January. In one week alone, the health-care bill derailed, the liberal radio network Air America went silent, and the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment allows corporations to pump as much money as they want into political campaigns. I've got no answers on the first two, but a few suggestions for avoiding despair on the third, the most serious threat to American democracy in a generation.
In a devastating decision, the high court cleared the way for one of those corporate takeovers you read about, only much bigger. If Exxon wants to spend $1 million (a bar tab for Big Oil) defeating an environmentalist running for city council, it can now do so. If Goldman Sachs wants to pay the entire cost of every congressional campaign in the U.S., the law of the land now allows it. The decision frees unions, too, but they already spend about as much as they can on politics. Fortune 100 firms currently spend only a fraction of 1 percent of their $605 billion in annual profits on buying politicians.
Here's a question for Alter.
How is it that the corporation you work for (Washington Post Corp) is allowed to espouse it's opinion and free speech on the public, thus campaigning for candidates and issues but Exxon/Mobil is not allowed to political pursue what's in it's corporate interests?
Maybe if Exxon/Mobil bought a TV station like GE owns MSNBC you'll be OK with that.
More....
No comments:
Post a Comment