Hypocrisy on high

Let me make sure I have this right. The Obamunists took in over 100 million in contributions $250 and under without disclosing who any of those donors were when many suspected that these donations came in from foreign sources.

In addition, how many union members money is used to support political candidates that the rank and file do not support.

But now they're all up in arms because businesses are out fighting against the persecution of what drives this country?




Actually, I believe there is an ulterior motive behind the administrations attempt to demean the Chamber. They want the chambers contributor list so they can inflict pain on those contributors.

If you don't believe me just see what's already happened to the Koch brothers and Target for their political contributions.

Follow up.

The WSJ has an article that addresses this very point..........

Democrats claim only to favor "disclosure" of donors, but their legal intimidation attempts are the best argument against disclosure. Liberals want the names of business donors made public so they can become targets of vilification with the goal of intimidating them into silence. A CEO or corporate board is likely to think twice about contributing to a campaign fund if the IRS or prosecutors might come calling. If Democrats can reduce business donations in the next three weeks, they can limit the number of GOP challengers with a chance to win and reduce Democratic Congressional losses. ...

More.....