On some beaches around Santa Barbara, you could feel the oozing tar between your toes -- and that was long before a Union Oil platform five miles offshore spilled crud all over 20 miles of coast in 1969. For centuries, the tar naturally had seeped up through the sand, providing the native Chumash with caulking for their canoes.
Oh, another thing: My dad was an oil field roustabout, or driller or whatever job he could fill on a given shift. So were his dad, brother and cousins. They left their Tennessee farms and followed the migration to California for the 1920s oil boom.
My first summer job out of high school was in a Ventura oil field, an experience guaranteed to prod a kid into college if nothing else would. (But the oil job paid better than newspaper work, I soon discovered.)
So "Big Oil" never has been a big bugaboo for me. It was the producer of a vital commodity and provider of working-class jobs. Although oil derricks annoy many people as unsightly, I've always marveled at how they work, especially all lighted up at night.
Like a lot of Californians, however, when the drilling platform fouled our beaches, I became a NIMBY. Get those leaking monstrosities out of our waters. No more drilling. And enough people felt the same that California's coast became off-limits to any additional oil exploration.
That was nearly 40 years ago.
At that point, America was importing only 24% of its oil. Today, it's up to nearly 70% and rising, a ludicrous transfer of American wealth.
Back then, we hadn't yet fought any Middle East wars with one eye on oil pipelines.
And nobody dreamed of $4 gas.
California is the nation's biggest consumer of gasoline -- 45 million gallons a day, plus 10 million gallons of diesel. That makes us the third-biggest petroleum-consuming entity in the world, behind only the United States and China.
We are the nation's No. 3 oil-producing state, behind Texas and Alaska.
But California produces only 39% of the crude oil it uses. An additional 16% comes from Alaska and the remaining 45% is bought from foreign sources, according to the California Energy Commission.
First, let me say, I'm not a beach guy. One of the reasons is that there's nothing to see on the beach but a horizon. Zippo.
About ten years ago, I went down to Gulf Shores Alabama to my client's condo. From the beach there, you could see an oil platform way off in the distance. I actually thought it was kind of cool because it visually gave the ocean scale and space.
As we debate this whole drilling issue, I'm trying to figure out what makes Florida, New Jersey, and California beaches so much more valuable than Alabama's? By the way, that beach in Alabama was 100 times nicer than Daytona, Rehobeth, Ocean City, etc. all of which I've visited.
Second, how is it that it's more environmentally friendly for the Saudi's to drill in their country, load our tankers with crude, move the tankers thousands of miles to the refinery than it is for us to drill and ship?
Third, how is it in our best interest to keep shipping money to anti American regimes when we can utilize our own resources and keep the money internal?
It's all about NIMBY.
No comments:
Post a Comment