Monday, May 18, 2009

The "Progressive" way

They called it paradise
The place to be
They watched the hazy sun
Sinking in the sea


Liberalism, sounds great on paper. After all, who could possibly be opposed to "From each according to abilities; to each according to need". It's so quaint. It's so empathetic. It's so not possible.

History has proven that socialist governments will ultimately implode under their own structure as it attempts to salve each and every need a population may have.

You need look no further than that "Progressive" paradise of California. A state of infinite resources and human talent and an infinite appetite for all things government....

Once, California was known as the “Golden State.” No more. It’s struggling with a fiscal crisis of epic proportions. And voters are so disgusted with the ineptitude and waste of a state legislature dominated by liberal Democrats that they are poised to vote down a $16 billion tax increase and a slew of propositions allegedly intended to beat back fiscal Armageddon.

If residents of the other 49 states haven’t focused on California’s plight yet, they should. In a real sense, California has become liberalism’s “canary in the coal mine.” It is an instructive – and frightening – warning of the toll exacted by the kind of leftism now in vogue in Washington, D.C..

Put simply, California is in desperate fiscal straits because it has become a place where government works for only two constituencies: Those who need public assistance, and unions. Sacramento is so busy responding to the needs of the one and the demands of the other that the legitimate expectations of regular, taxpaying citizens have been completely ignored.

For union members, life is good. California teachers earn 25% more than the national average, even though some of the most incompetent, indifferent or downright dangerous of them cannot be fired because of concessions won by the teachers’ unions. The SEIU is so powerful that some of its members were able to listen in on a phone call between the Obama administration and the state – which resulted in the President’s threat to withhold stimulus money if the cash-strapped state made even modest cuts in the salaries of unionized home health care employees. In fact, state government is routinely held hostage by public employee unions; not surprising when one considers that California is home to 356,000 state workers – 9.3 of them for every 1,000 residents.


Once again, I would appreciate a lefty explaining to me how life is so much better in the state of California than the state of Texas, a red state who spends much less in per resident state dollars.

More....

No comments: