Thursday, January 14, 2010

Laws are for thee not for me

If you provide the IRS or other government entities with fraudulent information you get fined and/or go to jail.

If you are a government official, you get to be called senator......

The Obama administration claims a dubious "Keynesian" multiplier of 1.5 to feed the Democrats' thirst for big spending. The administration's idea is that virtually all their spending creates jobs for unemployed people and that additional rounds of spending create still more—raising income by $1.50 for each dollar of government spending. Economists differ on such multipliers, with many leading figures pegging them at well under 1.0 as the government spending in part replaces private spending and jobs. But all agree that every dollar of spending requires a present value of a dollar of future taxes, which distorts decisions to work, save, and invest and raises the cost of the dollar of spending to well over a dollar. Thus, only spending with large societal benefits is justified, a criterion unlikely to be met by much current spending (perusing the projects on recovery.gov doesn't inspire confidence).

Even more blatant is the numbers game being used to justify health-insurance reform legislation, which claims to greatly expand coverage, decrease health-insurance costs, and reduce the deficit. That magic flows easily from counting 10 years of dubious Medicare "savings" and tax hikes, but only six years of spending; assuming large cuts in doctor reimbursements that later will be cancelled; and making the states (other than Sen. Ben Nelson's Nebraska) pay a big share of the cost by expanding Medicaid eligibility. The Medicare "savings" and payroll tax hikes are counted twice—first to help pay for expanded coverage, and then to claim to extend the life of Medicare.

One piece of good news: The public isn't believing much of this out-of-control spin. Large majorities believe the health-care legislation will raise their insurance costs and increase the budget deficit. Most Americans are highly skeptical of the claims of climate extremists. And they have a more realistic reaction to the extraordinary deterioration in our public finances than do the president and Congress.


More...

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Keynesianism is a horribly flawed theory born of The Depression. The only reason it has not been thrown into the dustbin of shitty ideas is that it is based on big govt making economic decisions. So, of the thousands of economic theories, which one would be cited by government politicians to be the best? Keynesianism.

Back when it was developed, the theory was that government should "prime the pump" of the economy to kick start us out of the depression.

That has been completely bastardized over the decades. Now politicians believe government IS the pump. If you base the economy on that belief we are doomed to indefinite recession.