Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Fannie Mae and Andrew Cuomo

The conservative paper of record, The Village Voice, lays out the changes made to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by Andrew Cuomo back in the Clinton administration which led to the current meltdown of those companies.
Andrew Cuomo, the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history, made a series of decisions between 1997 and 2001 that gave birth to the country's current crisis. He took actions that—in combination with many other factors—helped plunge Fannie and Freddie into the subprime markets without putting in place the means to monitor their increasingly risky investments. He turned the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program into a sweetheart lender with sky-high loan ceilings and no money down, and he legalized what a federal judge has branded "kickbacks" to brokers that have fueled the sale of overpriced and unsupportable loans. Three to four million families are now facing foreclosure, and Cuomo is one of the reasons why.

What he did is important—not just because of what it tells us about how we got in this hole, but because of what it says about New York's attorney general, who has been trying for months to don a white hat in the subprime scandal, pursuing cases against banks, appraisers, brokers, rating agencies, and multitrillion-dollar, quasi-public Fannie and Freddie.

It all starts, as the headlines of recent weeks do, with these two giant banks. But in the hubbub about their bailout, few have noticed that the only federal agency with the power to regulate what Cuomo has called "the gods of Washington" was HUD. Congress granted that power in 1992, so there were only four pre-crisis secretaries at the notoriously political agency that had the ability to rein in Fannie and Freddie: ex–Texas mayor Henry Cisneros and Bush confidante Alfonso Jackson, who were driven from office by criminal investigations; Mel Martinez, who left to chase a U.S. Senate seat in Florida; and Cuomo, who used the agency as a launching pad for his disastrous 2002 gubernatorial candidacy.


8 comments:

Joe C. said...

There were just too many messes left by the Clinton's in 8 years to clean up in 8 years - terrorism appeasement, CIA incompetence, military cuts, Justice Dept. and judicial incompetents, Corporate illegality by supporters - Enron, World Com, Tyco, Tyson, FannieMae and FreddieMac, and the .com and housing bubbles - plus others. All of these things had their origins in the Clinton years while the economy rode on Reagan's and Gingrich's successes. Imagine the havoc if Clinton had a Democrat Congress.

Yet people want to put another ultraleftist Democrat in charge with a Commie Congress just like Carter and Johnson - two administrations whose policies we are still paying for as well.

gordon gekko said...

Amen

Anonymous said...

so we get to decide between a socialist and one of the keating five... great.. they are both frauds to this country.

gordon gekko said...

I like to think of our choices as a choice between a socialist and a marxist.

Anonymous said...

Wait, who said you get any choice at all? It's already been made by the media, we just get to watch it played out on TV with tax dollars. It's the circus part of "bread and circuses."

Joe C. said...

It's between a Marxist a la Jimmuh Cahtah and a moderate a la Joe Lieberman.

Anonymous said...

A choice between a giant government and a gigantic government.

Anonymous said...

Cuomo is a bully who is proud of pushing people around and grabbing headlines. He's been privately intimidating our girlfriend who was once a supporter of his. When she became more social with Cuomo, she then found out he was playing games, hiding other relationships and generally lying to her so she said goodbye to him. But he refused to let her just walk away; AFTER ALL HE'S THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. A legion in his own mind. Even though she is a law abiding citizen he has privately threatened her alluding to the fact that he can ruin her life and ruin her career in NY even though she's broken no laws. Her business with him was personal, not political or officiall and because he can't boss my friend around, Cuomo tries to scare her and make her very existance feel shakey. Her frionds are beginning to talk about what he's done over and over to her. She's staying quiet because of his temper and threats, but we encourage her to come forward and tell everyone to put a stop to his harrassment. She voted for Cuomo and gave him a contribution; Cuomo in term has played with her and made her life as miserable as he could for over 2years now. The kinder he is to others in public, the more mean and demeaning he acts towards her. She is a nice blond woman who helps others in the fitness industry and who also does free work in the community. Where does Cuomo think his boundaries end? Is this a man with a job for the people or is every person (or woman) he meets subject to his punishment if they don't behave as he says they should. My friend has suffered endless duress because of Cuomo's hidden attempts at strong arming her. Her friends are blogging. He'll probably blame her for it as another excuse to be hostile toward her.