Monday, December 28, 2009

Giving the GOP it's props

I'm usually hard on the GOP because, more often than not, they seem more than willing to compromise basic conservative principles for political expediency.

But in the case of health care, republicans did show up for a change.

How do I know? I read this piece defending Max Baucus's drunken tirade on the house floor where the writer laid out this claim.........

Now, if you can read that, and you can, then you have to agree Baucus was not "slurring" or "drunk" , or "slobbering" when he was speaking. Otherwise he could not have got off such a great blast against Wicker.

And Conservatives know it.

Rather, Baucus was just plain tired and really angry. The product of long hours of debate against Republicans who just don't play fair at all.

Baucus made a great point. People like Maine's Republican Senator Olympia Snowe were really interested in passing health care reform, but were relentlessly pressured into not doing so. Personally, I think they're on the wrong side of history.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The libs are a bunch of crybabies. They have 60 votes. ALL 60 went for a very liberal bill. If they really wanted bi-partisanship they should have taken a few republican ideas like HSAs and tort reform. They would lose Durbin, and Schumer but they would get votes from senators like Snowe, Collins and Rinovich and still get their 60. Then they would have bi-partisan.

But be honest Max. What democrats mean by bi-partisan is that dems craft communist legislation, and some republicans jump on board. Thank God not one republican fell for that crap.

Max, America has said they don't want your piece of shit bill. But you are going to ram it into America's collective rectum anyway aren't you? Be honest, you want republicans on board for one reason: as a scapegoat to blame for the impending heathcare catastrophe that you know will happen thanks to you.