There was much talk about change last week at the Democratic convention. But are the Democrats really offering any substantive change?To find out, I pulled out John Kerry's 2004 Democratic national platform and compared its fiscal policy with that contained in today's Barack Obama-inspired missive.
The documents are so similar it's creepy. While there are a number of new minor policies, and fresh details on old targets such as health care, the big picture has stayed the same.
When Democrats say they offer change, what they really mean is that things will be different if voters accept the policies they rejected last time.
To be fair, there are some alterations this year.
Both platforms promise to extend the Bush income-tax cuts for the middle class, but repeal them for the rich. In 2004, Kerry defined rich as those making more than $200,000. Today, Obama promises not to increase taxes on anyone making less than $250,000.
So the definition of rich has increased from $200,000 to $250,000. That's change you can believe in that will be especially appreciated by everyone making between $200,000 and $249,999.
"In fact, in Feelingstown, facts become insults: If facts debunk feelings, it is the facts that must lose." Ben Shapiro
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
The party of change?
From Bloomberg News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment